What is a required quality for evidence to be relevant?

For evidence to be classified as relevant, it is essential that it contributes to proving or disproving a fact pertinent to the case. This means that the evidence must have a direct connection to the issues being decided in the legal context. For example, if a piece of evidence demonstrates a link between the defendant and the crime scene, or supports the timeline of events, it is considered relevant because it helps clarify facts that are in dispute.

Relevance is fundamentally about the relationship between the evidence and the facts of the case; it is evaluated based on whether it provides insight that could influence the outcome of the proceedings. This concept is a cornerstone of legal standards regarding evidence, ensuring that the information presented to the court aids in making a sound and informed judgment.

The other considerations, such as complexity, prior use, or understandability, do not inherently affect the relevance of evidence in the same way. While evidence can benefit from being clear and easily comprehensible, these factors do not determine its relevance to the facts of a case.